FIFA is pushing forward with plans to create a $20 billion commercial subsidiary and sell minority stakes to private investors, defying a unanimous boycott threat from UEFA and rejections from regional confederations across North America, Central America, and the Caribbean.
The governance battle erupted into the open after European nations agreed to boycott all FIFA competitions, including the men’s and women’s World Cups, if the global governing body refuses to abandon the scheme.
FIFA Forward Enterprise and the $20 Billion Private Equity Pitch
The controversy centers on FIFA’s proposal to establish a new commercial entity named FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE).
Novanews, a fund run by Joshua Kushner — brother of Jared Kushner, who is U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law — is expected to lead the incoming private investor group.
FIFA also confirmed that even if member associations oppose the FFE plan and the proposal passes anyway, those opposed will still receive $20 million (£14.9m) each in the 2027–30 cycle, with subsequent payouts in 2031–34 and 2035–38.
UEFA’s Nuclear Boycott Threat and Regional Rejections
The financial incentives failed to appease continental federations, which swiftly mobilized against the proposal. Following an emergency meeting, UEFA’s 55 member nations voted unanimously to unequivocally reject the plan, warning that turning the sport’s crown jewel into an investment product compromises the integrity of international football.

“Football’s future cannot be dictated by the expectations of those whose first duty is to maximise financial return. Nor can the interests of national associations, leagues, clubs, players and supporters become subordinate to investor returns. Football cannot mortgage its future for financial gain.”
Aleksander Čeferin, UEFA President
Opposition quickly spread beyond Europe. The Confederation of North, Central American and Caribbean Association Football (Concacaf) held a meeting where its 41 members, including 2026 World Cup co-hosts the United States, Canada, and Mexico, voted to reject the proposal. The U.S. Meanwhile, the Asian Football Confederation issued a scathing letter warning that the plan could never succeed without the backing of all six regional blocs.
FIFA Defends Democracy Amid Accusations of Governance by Intimidation
FIFA dismissed the criticism and pushed back against accusations that it was auctioning off the sport. In a statement issued in the middle of the European night, the governing body maintained that its consultations were derailed by inaccurate media coverage.

“Everyone has the right to express their opposition and to seek further clarification but no single entity can claim to represent all 211 MAs around the world. Each MA should be allowed to review the proposal and have a say in shaping their own future. These are the democratic principles of FIFA.”
FIFA, governing body statement
The governing body insisted that nobody is selling football and stressed that it would not proceed with the FFE proposal without majority backing from its member associations. FIFA argued that the restructure is designed to ensure global development funding and true self-determination for every member association.
“We want to keep football for the fans, for everyone, not for other interests. So hopefully this will not happen.”
Xabi Alonso, Chelsea coach and World Cup winner
What Happens Next in the Global Governance Standoff
FIFA intends to continue its consultation process through the summer, aiming to secure member association votes based on facts rather than rumors. For the scheme to pass, it requires a majority vote from FIFA’s 211 member associations alongside approval from the 37-member FIFA Council.
With UEFA and Concacaf representing 96 associations — nearly half of FIFA’s total voting membership — and the Asian Football Confederation expressing deep skepticism, Infantino faces a steep path to secure the necessary majority before the September 19 deadline.