The Terriers utilized a highly efficient offensive performance to secure a 26-point victory over the Wildcats.
Boston University dominates the scoreboard
According to data from NCAA.com, the Terriers finished the game shooting 46.4% from the field.
The Terriers’ ability to find rhythm from beyond the arc proved decisive. They converted 11 of 19 three-point attempts, a 57.9% success rate that kept the defense stretched. This perimeter accuracy complemented a strong showing at the free-throw line, where Boston University shot 78.6%.
Johnson & Wales struggled to find an answer for the Terriers’ scoring bursts. While the Wildcats managed to keep the game relatively competitive in the opening period, the gap widened as the game progressed. The final margin of 26 points reflected a game that drifted out of reach in the latter stages.
Terrier statistical leaders
Several players contributed to the high-scoring output for Boston University. Jason Hines led the team in scoring with 16 points, shooting 6-of-12 from the field. Omar Grullon also scored 13 points and made 4-of-6 three-point attempts.

The following table breaks down the primary scoring contributions from the Boston University roster:
| Player | Position | Minutes | FGM-A | 3PM-A | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason Hines | G | 29.2 | 6-12 | 2-4 | 16 |
| Omar Grullon | G | 33.6 | 4-14 | 4-6 | 13 |
| Orden Roberts | G | 22.8 | 3-5 | 3-3 | 9 |
Beyond the scoring, the Terriers controlled the glass and the tempo. The team recorded 17 total rebounds and managed to limit turnovers, despite the high-paced nature of the contest.
Wildcats struggle to find consistency
While the Wildcats kept the score close early on, they were unable to match the efficiency displayed by Boston University.
The Wildcats’ offensive efforts were unevenly distributed. While they managed to stay within striking distance during much of the first half, the cumulative impact of Boston University’s shooting meant the deficit became insurmountable. The Wildcats finished the game with 74 points, trailing by 26.
Defensively, the Wildcats were tasked with containing a multi-pronged attack. The Terriers’ ability to rotate scoring between guards like Hines and Grullon, and shooters like Roberts, prevented Johnson & Wales from settling into a single defensive scheme.
The game highlighted the gap in shooting efficiency between the two programs. While the Terriers leaned heavily on their 57.9% three-point shooting, the Wildcats were unable to replicate that level of precision to mount a comeback.