Publishers Sue Brave Over AI Scraping and Paywall Bypassing

The New York Times Sues Brave Web Browser Over Paywall Bypass and AI Scraping

“While we believe in the ethical and responsible use and development of AI, Brave has flouted established copyright law and ignored repeated requests by The Times to stop its infringing conduct,” said Graham James, an NYT spokesperson, in a statement reported by The Verge. That statement anchors a legal battle targeting the company behind the Brave web browser over allegations of unlawful content scraping for artificial intelligence and enabling users to bypass paywalls without consent.

The litigation, which also involves a group of other publications, takes direct aim at how modern web browsing tools interact with publisher revenue models. According to a complaint filed by the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by providing AI companies with paid access to real-time online content from the Brave Index. The legal filings claim that Brave has supplied stolen copyrighted material to numerous artificial intelligence firms, including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere, allowing them to train models or respond directly to user queries.

Paywall Blockers and the Back Door to Journalism

At the center of the dispute is Brave’s promotion of its built-in paywall blocker feature, which grants users access to content from hundreds of top publishers. The complaint states bluntly that Brave never asked for permission to access these websites, copy the material, or distribute it to third-party AI developers. Instead, the browser has allegedly taken proactive steps to prevent publishers from blocking Brave’s access while failing to compensate them for the use of their reporting.

Steven Lieberman, the attorney who filed the lawsuit on behalf of the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, pulled no punches regarding the mechanics of the alleged operation. “AI giants are now desperate to avoid getting caught red-handed stealing news from publishers, so Brave Software is selling them a back door to the journalism they know they have no right to,” Lieberman said. He added that buying secondhand stolen goods does not make them legitimate, framing the browser’s index as a laundering operation for pirated reporting.

Perplexity Hits Back as Other Firms Decline Comment

Representatives for Brave, Anthropic, Mistral, SpaceXSI, and Cohere did not immediately reply to requests for comment from reporters. However, Perplexity pushed back forcefully against the allegations.

“The New York Times is overpaying its attorneys and underpaying its journalists. (Who could’ve easily identified the disinformation in this suit.)” — Jesse Dwyer, Perplexity’s chief communications officer

The case highlights a deepening friction between traditional newsrooms fighting to protect digital subscriptions and tech platforms building automated indices. With multiple major metropolitan newspapers and the New York Times united in court against Brave Software, the outcome of this litigation could redefine how web browsers handle paywalls and real-time content indexing for generative models.

Keep reading