The Brennan Center for Justice is urging the New York City Council to drastically tighten oversight of the New York Police Department’s artificial intelligence tools, warning that existing safeguards are failing to protect civil liberties, brennancenter.org reported.
Pushing for Deeper Scrutiny After Council Hearings
The call for stronger governance follows an October 5, 2026, hearing held by the New York City Council Committee of the Whole. That session brought tech executives from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and Meta together with city officials and residents to debate the risks and regulatory frameworks surrounding artificial intelligence.
Rachel Levinson-Waldman, director of the Liberty and National Security Program, testified at the hearing that current oversight mechanisms leave New Yorkers exposed to surveillance overreach. While the NYPD has publicly acknowledged deploying facial recognition, gunshot detection, and social media monitoring via disclosures mandated by the Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology (POST) Act, those summaries omit crucial details.
Specifically, the disclosures fail to explain how artificial intelligence operates within the Domain Awareness System, the department’s data-fusion platform that aggregates information from various surveillance networks.
Brennan Center Proposes Reforms for NYPD Oversight Offices
To counter these visibility gaps, the Brennan Center outlined three specific reforms for the City Council. First, lawmakers must ensure the Office of Inspector General for the NYPD receives the funding, permanent leadership, and technical expertise required to scrutinize automated policing tools. This requires the Department of Investigations to appoint a new Inspector General and hire more staff.
Second, the Council must compel the Office of Technology and Innovation to fully staff the Office of Algorithmic Accountability. That office was scheduled to open its doors in June 2026 but remains without a permanent director or staff.
Finally, the Brennan Center wants the Council to schedule a dedicated hearing focused strictly on the NYPD’s artificial intelligence use. Under this proposal, the department would be required to explain exactly which algorithmic tools it employs, how they influence day-to-day policing decisions, and what safeguards protect the public.
The organization’s push builds on years of prior advocacy. In 2023, then-Brennan Center counsel Ivey Dyson co-wrote an article with City Council Member Jennifer Gutiérrez demanding greater oversight of police surveillance. Those warnings expanded into formal research reports published in 2024 covering oversight failures in New York City and Washington, D.C., followed by a 2025 expert brief detailing the specific dangers tied to unregulated AI-powered policing tools and data-fusion networks.