South Carolina Truth in Shrimp Labeling Act Now Requires Origin Disclosure

South Carolina restaurants must now explicitly tell customers whether the shrimp on their plates was caught in local waters or imported from overseas. The “Truth in Shrimp Labeling Act” officially took effect after a 120-day grace period following Henry McMaster’s signature, as reported by WCIV. The law mandates that seafood origin be disclosed on menus or through clear signage across the state.

Earlier this year, roughly 40 restaurants faced intense scrutiny after claiming their shrimp was local when it was actually imported.

Shrimp labeling law takes effect in South Carolina

The fight for the Lowcountry plate

For generations of fishermen, the influx of cheaper, imported shrimp has been a challenge. Rocky Magwood, a shrimper in McClellanville whose family has been in the business for about 110 years that they can prove, has spent nearly five decades moving shrimp in McClellanville. He believes that if a family can do a job for 110 years, they are “doing pretty good.” He views the new transparency requirements as a way to level a playing field that has been tilted toward global imports for too long.

“You come to Charleston, you should get what you think you’re eating,” Magwood said.

The economic stakes are high. Magwood noted that while imports remain a challenge, he finally sees “some light coming” for the local industry. He believes local shrimpers will “get a little bit more ground back from the imports.”

station icon
Photo: chilichili.net

How restaurants are adapting to the mandate

The transition hasn’t been a shock to every establishment. Some businesses had already pivoted toward transparency before the law became a requirement. In Mount Pleasant, Arts—one of the area’s oldest bars—already uses stickers to certify that their shrimp is local. General manager Jessica Brighenty says the move is about more than just compliance; it’s about preserving the “roots of the community” from McClellanville down the entire coastline.

While some restaurants are using physical stickers or menu footnotes, others have taken to social media to shout about their local sourcing. The requirement is designed to be straightforward: if the shrimp comes from Indonesia, the menu says so. If it comes from Charleston, the menu says so. Magwood said the process is simple: “Put it on your menu and tell me if somebody wants to eat shrimp from Indonesia or they wanna eat it from Charleston, South Carolina.”

The tension between cost and community

Magwood argues that the state should prioritize using local resources first, stating, “We should be using what we have,” and suggesting imports should only happen if local supply is unavailable. He believes the law ensures fishermen have a “fair shot” with consumers.

A broader shift in seafood transparency

Through the “Truth in Shrimp Labeling Act” state law, South Carolina now requires restaurants to disclose whether the shrimp they serve is local or imported.

New shrimp labeling law now in effect in SC

The practical result for the diner is a simpler choice. Instead of trusting a verbal claim from a server, the burden of proof has shifted to the menu. As Magwood puts it, the goal isn’t to ban imports entirely, but to ensure that fishermen have a fair shot to sell what they have before the state relies on outside sources.

The question that remains is how strictly the state will enforce these labels.