Trump administration tries to prosecute Comey for third time

Former FBI Director James Comey faced two counts of leaking national defense information filed by the United States Department of Justice on Monday, October 26, 2026. Bypassing a grand jury with an unusual legal maneuver, the Trump administration targeted the long-standing presidential critic for the third time.

Federal prosecutors in Washington, D.C., filed a two-count criminal information. The filing alleged that former FBI Director James Comey knowingly transmitted sensitive defense data. It stated he conspired with others to disclose it to a news outlet.

The charging documents state that the alleged actions took place on October 4 and 5, 2016. They stemmed from a New York Times article published on October 5, 2016.

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Dustin Farahnak wrote in a filing that the investigation uncovered evidence that Comey sought to correct misinformation published by Reuters the day before. According to the filing, Comey directed staff to speak with New York Times reporter Charlie Savage about those accuracy concerns, thereby transferring classified information.

Ten-Year Statute of Limitations and Waiverless Information

By filing a criminal information instead of seeking an immediate grand jury indictment, prosecutors bypassed normal grand jury review. Michael Bromwich, a former Justice Department inspector general turned defense attorney, told reporters that he had never encountered a situation where a criminal information was filed solely to pause the statute of limitations.

The Justice Department defended the procedure in a public statement. The department explained that filing a waiverless criminal information is a widely recognized practice approved by multiple Circuit Courts of Appeals to toll the 10-year limitation period while an investigation remains active.

The Department filed a waiverless criminal information to toll the statute of limitations as it relates to allegations concerning former FBI Director Comey. Filing a criminal information to toll the statute of limitations is a widely recognized practice in federal court and has been approved by multiple Circuit Courts of Appeals. This is an ongoing criminal investigation, and we will not comment further.

Justice Department spokesperson, via Agence France-Presse and wire reports

Comey’s defense team, led by attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, moved to dismiss the case. Fitzgerald argued that two separate investigative teams during the first Trump administration had already examined the 2016 article and determined no charges should be brought against anyone. Fitzgerald maintained that the government missed its window to secure a valid indictment before the decade-long limit expired.

Third Prosecution Against Comey Since January 2025

The new case represents the third federal prosecution launched against Comey since Donald Trump returned to the White House in January 2025. An earlier indictment accusing Comey of lying to Congress was thrown out by a federal judge who ruled the prosecutor had been unlawfully appointed. A second case, filed in North Carolina over an Instagram post featuring a photo of seashells spelling out the numbers "8647"—interpreted by the administration as a threat against the 47th president—remains pending.

In a video statement released shortly after the court documents were unsealed, Comey dismissed the allegations as political retribution.

Former FBI director James Comey hit with third set of charges under Trump
Photo: Al Jazeera

Well, they’re back — again. It would almost be funny if it weren’t such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice — one that we cannot become numb to. Nothing’s changed with me; I’m still innocent, I’m still not afraid of these people — and I still believe in an independent federal judiciary.

James Comey, former FBI Director

Judicial Ruling Reinstates Maurene Comey

The unsealing of the federal charging documents coincided with a separate courtroom defeat for the administration. A federal judge ruled that the dismissal of Comey’s daughter, Maurene Comey, from her position as an assistant U.S. attorney in New York was unlawful and retaliatory.

District Judge Jesse Furman ordered the Justice Department to provide the younger Comey with retroactive reinstatement. District Judge Jesse Furman ordered back pay, concluding that her due process rights had been violated during the purge of officials perceived as disloyal to the administration.

Well, they’re back — again. It would almost be funny if it weren’t such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice — one that we cannot become numb to. Nothing’s changed with me; I’m still innocent, I’m still not afraid of these people — and I still believe in an independent federal judiciary.

James Comey, former FBI Director