Maryland is moving toward a new regulatory framework for product waste, shifting the financial burden of disposal from municipal taxpayers to the companies that manufacture and sell consumer goods.
As state lawmakers evaluate potential Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation, compliance requirements are changing, mirroring trends seen in Vermont and beyond.
Specialists like Andriana Kontovrakis, the Director of Compliance Services for the US team at Reverse Logistics Group, are managing the transition toward these systems. Kontovrakis oversees teams tasked with ensuring that manufacturers and retailers meet the complex, evolving requirements for electronics, batteries, and packaging waste. Her work involves balancing the operational needs of global firms with the increasingly granular state-level mandates that define the modern American waste management sector.
EPR laws represent a fundamental change in how the United States handles household hazardous waste and packaging. Traditionally, local governments have absorbed the costs and logistical challenges of recycling and waste prevention. Under the EPR model, that responsibility migrates upstream to the producers, who must now account for the end-of-life impact of their products.
Kontovrakis brings a background in policy analysis to this challenge, having previously served as the Deputy Director for Waste Prevention for the NYC Department of Sanitation.
She also held a role as a Policy Analyst with the global electronics recycler Sims Lifecycle Solutions, where she managed program implementation for the company’s US EPR compliance unit. This experience informs her current efforts to build the Household Product Stewardship Alliance, an organization she is spearheading alongside the Household and Commercial Products Association.

The Household Product Stewardship Alliance is currently forming under the specific regulatory guidelines established by Vermont’s household hazardous waste EPR law. By creating a centralized stewardship organization, companies aim to pool resources and standardize compliance efforts across multiple jurisdictions. This approach is intended to reduce the administrative friction that occurs when states pass disparate waste management policies.
“We are working to ensure that manufacturers and retailers have a clear path to compliance as these laws continue to proliferate,” Kontovrakis noted regarding her work with Reverse Logistics Group. The alliance functions as a bridge, helping businesses adapt to the regulatory requirements that now govern household hazardous wastes and consumer product packaging.
For manufacturers, the primary concern is the cost of implementing reverse logistics programs. Unlike traditional distribution, where goods move from a warehouse to a consumer, reverse logistics requires a complex, integrated system to collect, sort, and process waste materials. The regulatory frameworks in states like Maryland and Vermont mandate that these systems be funded by the producers, rather than through general tax revenue.
Critics of these mandates often point to the potential for increased consumer prices as firms pass compliance costs down the supply chain. Proponents, however, argue that the current municipal waste model is unsustainable and that EPR laws incentivize companies to design more recyclable, less toxic packaging.
As states move forward with these frameworks, the role of compliance specialists becomes central to maintaining the balance between environmental policy goals and the operational realities of the retail market.
The development of the Household Product Stewardship Alliance remains a focal point for industry participants watching the Maryland legislative session. With regulatory pressure mounting, the ability to form effective, industry-led stewardship organizations may determine how quickly and effectively states can transition to these producer-funded models.