The national informal employment rate reached 26.4% during the July–September 2026 quarter, marking a 0.2 percentage point increase compared to the same period last year.
According to the latest Bulletin of Labour Informality released by the National Statistics Institute (INE), this shift highlights an ongoing tension within the labor market as total informally employed persons fell slightly to 2,451,443.
The Bottom Line:
- The informal employment rate rose to 26.4% year-on-year, despite a net decrease of 6,909 informally employed individuals.
- Gender divergence remains stark: male informal employment dropped by 0.8%, while female informal employment increased by 0.3%.
- Roughly 85.6% of all informal employment is concentrated within two groups: own-account workers and private-sector wage earners.
The marginal increase in the national rate masks a significant decline in the absolute number of informally employed workers, which fell by 0.3% over the quarter. This reduction was primarily driven by a sharp contraction in male informal labor. Younger demographics also saw notable shifts, with the 15–24 age bracket reporting a 13.1% decrease, while the 25–34 group saw a 1.7% decline.
Economic sectors traditionally associated with high informal labor density faced the most significant cooling. Commerce activity recorded a 6.0% drop, while other service activities plummeted by 10.8%. Occupational data from the INE further confirms this trend, showing a 3.0% decline in service and sales roles and a 15.6% drop in agriculture and fishery positions.
While the broader market showed signs of shedding informal roles, specific sub-sectors bucked the trend. Domestic work saw a surge of 11.3%, and unpaid family work rose by 13.8%. Public-sector wage earners also experienced a 2.8% increase in informal status, complicating the overall narrative of labor market formalization.

Own-account workers and private-sector wage earners remain the bedrock of this category, representing 85.6% of the informally employed population. Within these groups, the informal employment rates stand at 62.1% and 15.9%, respectively. The decline in own-account informal work was particularly pronounced among women, who saw a 3.3% reduction, and within the commerce sector, where figures dropped by 9.5%.
“The persistence of informal employment, even as absolute numbers shift, underscores a structural gap in social security access that remains resistant to broader macroeconomic fluctuations,” noted an analyst familiar with regional labor statistics.
For the average household, this data serves as a barometer for financial stability and access to critical social safety nets. The INE defines informally employed persons as those lacking access to essential social security benefits, including healthcare and pension contributions.
When the rate of informal employment rises, it signals a systemic increase in the number of workers operating without long-term financial protections, which can limit consumer spending power and increase reliance on public assistance during economic downturns.
Institutional investors and regulators monitor these figures closely to gauge the health of the labor market. A high informal rate often correlates with tax base erosion and limited efficacy of monetary policy, as large segments of the workforce remain outside the formal banking and credit systems.
As the economy moves toward the end of 2026, the divergence between shrinking sectors like commerce and expanding ones like domestic service will be a key metric for policy makers adjusting fiscal and labor market regulations.
The labor market continues to navigate these shifts, with the next release from the National Statistics Institute expected to clarify whether the recent uptick in the informal rate is a temporary anomaly or the beginning of a sustained trend.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for educational and market analysis purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Always consult with a certified financial professional before making investment decisions.