Rural Alaska voting sites failed to open, state officials confirm

Remote Voting Sites Fail to Open Across Rural Alaska as Midterm Balloting Begins

More than a week after early and in-person absentee voting kicked off across Alaska on October 19, polling places in several remote rural communities have failed to fully open their doors to voters, according to reports outlined by state officials.

The exact scale of the disruption remains contested. In a letter sent to the Alaska Division of Elections and Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom, Anchorage Democratic Sen. Bill Wielechowski flagged voters in 18 communities who reported running into closed doors at their local voting stations.

“The information that I got was from some groups that have people on the ground in these villages who literally went to the polling place on (Oct.) 19th and the 20th, and they were not open,” Wielechowski said in an interview.

Elections officials have pushed back against that specific count while confirming that multiple sites indeed missed their scheduled openings. In a responding letter to Wielechowski, Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher stated that three locations had explicitly “declined to open” while another three failed to respond entirely to state inquiries.

“Each of the absentee voting locations listed in your letter provided a signed agreement to the Division listing the location and hours,” Beecher wrote, noting that this schedule was listed on the division’s website and updated as needed.

Disputed Counts and Missing Updates on the Ground

The state maintains that 12 of the 18 sites flagged by Wielechowski were actually open. Contacted by Alaska Public Media, municipal and village officials in 10 communities confirmed their voting sites were operating, though frequently on inconsistent schedules rather than standard hours.

Rural Alaska voting sites failed to open, state officials confirm
Photo: wrangellsentinel.com

Meanwhile, operational realities varied widely by region. Officials in Huslia and Toksook Bay reported that voting was restricted to appointment-only formats. In Gambell, an official confirmed that balloting finally started on Friday, arriving later than initially planned. Over in Newhalen, local officials moved to close early absentee voting ahead of schedule to ensure existing ballots could be mailed out in time.

None of those operational shifts appeared on the Division of Elections website. Five villages—Ekwok, Goodnews Bay, Kongiganak, Mertarvik, and Scammon Bay—were formally designated on the state portal as temporarily closed, while Chignik Bay, Fort Wainwright, and Levelock were quietly removed from the directory entirely without explanation.

A voter casts an early vote in Juneau at the State Office Building on Oct. 26, 2026
Photo: kmxt.org

Kendra Kloster, director of government relations for the Alaska Federation of Natives, pointed out that the communications breakdown inevitably fuels voter confusion. She noted that while small communities handling multiple local priorities might only manage limited early voting days, the state has a responsibility to broadcast those schedules clearly.

“I don’t want to dictate to a community exactly how they can do it. Maybe they can only offer a few days of early voting because they have so many things on their plate, and I totally understand. If that’s the case, then I think that information just needs to be clearly communicated, so it isn’t seen as not being available or being open when it is,” Kloster said in an interview.

Western Alaska Faces Ballot Delivery and Clerical Concerns

The Division of Elections stated it mailed ballots to absentee voting officials across 109 communities in Western Alaska, aiming to establish access in as many remote areas as possible. However, the agency declined to clarify why eight specific sites experienced temporary closures or disappeared from public tracking pages.

Trump DOJ pushes election lawsuits in California, Alaska as voting begins

Wielechowski also raised alarms regarding potential clerical errors by local voting officials that could jeopardize completed ballots. Beecher countered that concern by pointing to state law, assuring that absentee in-person ballots are protected from rejection due to mistakes made by absentee voting officials.

“Absentee in-person ballots are not rejected because of mistakes made by AVOs,” Beecher wrote.

The friction surrounding remote access echoes broader debates over election administration in Alaska. Earlier this year, Gov. Mike Dunleavy vetoed a package of legislative voting reforms championed by Wielechowski that proponents argued would have smoothed out these exact operational bottlenecks before the midterm cycle.