Massachusetts Antiabortion Coalition Submits Law Repeal Signatures

Antiabortion Coalition Submits Signatures for Referendum to Repeal Massachusetts Abortion Law

Antiabortion organizers in Massachusetts are pressing forward with a petition drive to put a newly expanded abortion law before voters, setting up a high-stakes constitutional showdown with Governor Maura Healey.

The campaign had until Nov. 6 to submit the paperwork to Secretary of State William F. Galvin’s office, which must confirm it collected enough certified signatures to qualify the measure.

The political clash centers on an abortion measure signed into law in early August. Previously, regulations permitted terminations at that point in pregnancy strictly under narrow conditions, such as safeguarding the life of the patient. The new law leaves the decision to end a pregnancy entirely to “the professional judgment of a physician,” making Massachusetts’ laws among the country’s broadest.

The Governor’s Emergency Authority and Past Precedent

With the signatures submitted, attention now turns to Governor Healey and whether she will use her executive powers to block the repeal effort. By invoking the state Constitution, she has the authority to designate the abortion legislation as an “emergency” enactment, which would enforce it right away and halt any delay tactics until the initiative reaches the ballot nearly two years from now in 2028.

A spokesperson for Healey stated that the administration “continues to monitor the referendum process and evaluate options,” stopping short of confirming whether an emergency declaration will be issued. Supporters of the abortion law point to real-world impacts in urging the governor to act. Dr. Angel Foster, a physician with Cambridge Reproductive Health Consultants, said that patients facing traumatic medical events at 28 weeks previously had to shoulder thousands of dollars in travel expenses to seek care outside the Commonwealth.

This dynamic mirrors a recent battle over state gun laws. Proponents of Second Amendment liberties gathered sufficient petition signatures during 2024 to instantly halt and place a referendum on the current year’s ballot aimed at striking down several major state restrictions on firearm ownership. Days before those signatures were due, Healey declared the legislation an “emergency,” a move that drew intense backlash from gun rights advocates. That repeal effort is listed as Question 9 on the ballot.

Clashing Arguments Over Democratic Process and Healthcare Access

Organizers behind the antiabortion push argue that deploying an emergency declaration on the abortion law would subvert the will of the electorate. Campaign figures urged the governor to respect the democratic process, asserting that the legislative change does not fit the criteria of a true emergency.

“The emergency preamble is reserved for times of true emergency,” said Miele. “There is no case to be made that this law is an emergency at all.”

On the other side, reproductive rights advocates argue that the referendum is part of a coordinated national strategy to restrict healthcare access. Sheila Ramirez, executive director of the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts, accused the petition organizers of using fear and misinformation to stigmatize abortion care. Kathleen Melendy, Massachusetts state director for Reproductive Equity Now, similarly characterized the repeal effort as an extension of a broader national anti-abortion campaign.

Abortion display
Photo: statehousenews.com

The statute has already shaped state politics, emerging as a central debate point between Healey and Republican nominee Michael Minogue. While Minogue described himself as pro-life and stated he would “obey the law. I will follow the law,” he did not take a stand on the repeal effort specifically. Healey countered by arguing that she trusts women to make decisions and “Mike Minogue doesn’t.”

State officials now face a review window to vet the petitions, while the threat of an emergency declaration hangs over the entire repeal timeline.

Massachusetts Passes Repeal Of 173-Year-Old Abortion Ban | TIME