Court Overturns Confidentiality Rule in Air Passenger Complaints

An Ontario Superior Court judge has struck down a federal regulation that prohibited air travellers from sharing the outcomes of complaints filed with the Canadian Transportation Agency. The Wednesday ruling determined that the policy, in place since 2023, violated the Charter right to freedom of expression.

The regulation had effectively barred both consumers and airlines from publicly disclosing the results of disputes regarding issues such as accessible travel and compensation for cancelled flights unless both parties agreed to waive confidentiality. Justice Charles Hackland, who authored the decision, concluded that the government failed to provide evidence that such secrecy was necessary for the efficiency of the adjudication process or the protection of sensitive information.

Challenging the ‘Gag Order’

The constitutional challenge was initiated over a year ago by the advocacy group Air Passenger Rights. Gabor Lukacs, the group’s president, had long criticized the confidentiality requirements, characterizing them as a “gag order” that kept the complaints process hidden inside a “black box.”

According to Lukacs, the ruling serves to empower passengers by removing the fear of public discussion regarding their claims. He argued that the previous system disadvantaged consumers, as only the airlines maintained access to the databases of rulings. By allowing for transparency, Lukacs stated, the court has helped create a more level playing field for both passengers and advocates.

Airline Industry Opposition

Major Canadian carriers—including Air Canada, WestJet, Air Transat, and Jazz Aviation—along with the industry group representing them, had opposed the legal challenge. In a motion to intervene earlier this year, the airlines argued that complaint submissions contain sensitive data that could threaten commercial interests and create privacy risks for both employees and passengers.

Furthermore, the industry raised concerns that public disclosure could compromise safety, suggesting that workers might be hesitant to report issues if those disclosures could lead to increased payouts to passengers. While the airlines sought to participate in the proceedings to provide a fuller evidentiary record, a judge dismissed their request to intervene in March.

Jeff Morrison, CEO of the National Airlines Council of Canada, stated in an email that while the organization is reviewing the court’s decision, it was unfortunate that airlines were not granted the opportunity to participate in the case.

Transparency and the Open Court Principle

N.S. couple wins court battle with Air Canada over flight delay

Beyond the issue of freedom of expression, Justice Hackland highlighted the importance of the “open court principle.” He noted that the regulator violated this principle by refusing to release decisions, orders, or other related documents upon request, including to the media. The CBC participated in the court action as an intervenor, arguing that the confidentiality rules constrained the media’s ability to report on passenger complaints.

The federal government had attempted to defend the policy, arguing that the confidentiality requirements formed a reasonable limit on freedom of expression. However, the court found this position unsupported by evidence.

Context of the Growing Complaint Backlog

The legal battle over transparency arrives as the Canadian Transportation Agency faces a significant backlog of unresolved complaints, which Justice Hackland noted had recently approached 100,000.

In May, Transport Minister Steven MacKinnon described the backlog as “unacceptable” and announced plans for an overhaul of the system. The government’s proposed strategy includes:

* Outsourcing the complaints process to an independent, third-party dispute resolution organization.
* Utilizing private-sector expertise to settle disputes within a more efficient timeframe.
* Increasing the agency’s enforcement powers by raising maximum fines for systemic violations of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations to $1 million.
* Simplification of the passenger rights charter to ensure rules are clearer and compensation is processed more rapidly.

While the government had previously vowed to remove the onus on passengers to maintain confidentiality to improve transparency, the court’s ruling now mandates this shift, overriding the previous regulatory framework. Currently, the Canada Transportation Act sets a maximum penalty of $5,000 for individuals who breach confidentiality rules, a figure that remains distinct from the larger, million-dollar fines intended for systemic airline violations.

Find more reporting in our News section.