Bill Essayli fights to block thousands of California ballots

Bill Essayli, the interim U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, is fighting to block thousands of ballots from being counted in the upcoming midterms, claiming the voters are likely noncitizens. In a lawsuit against the state of California, Essayli is demanding that officials set aside ballots from approximately 20,000 individuals to verify their eligibility before they are tallied, a move that state election officials say is logistically impossible and risks disenfranchising legitimate U.S. citizens, The Guardian reported.

This legal battle is the latest in a series of aggressive, politically charged actions by Essayli since he was appointed to lead one of the country’s largest federal prosecutor’s offices in April 2025. By fighting to block thousands of votes from being counted and prosecuting Trump’s critics, Essayli has shifted the office’s focus toward the priorities of the president, with a federal judge ruling in one case that he was acting “unlawfully”.

Full interview | U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli defends Trump administration's lawsuit on California

A campaign to chill the vote

Beyond the arrests, Essayli has extended his threats to the people who manage the elections. He has warned election officials that anyone who “knowingly processes” a ballot cast by a noncitizen would be opening themselves to “legal jeopardy.” While the Department of Justice contends the data justifies these moves, state officials argue the information is unreliable. An appeals court issued an initial ruling against the DoJ’s bid to set aside the votes on Monday.

“This is all in service of an intentional effort to chill the vote in California,” said Sergio Perez, a former DoJ lawyer and civil rights advocate. “It’s improper politicization of the office. And it’s unheard of for a US attorney to engage in this kind of activity on the eve of an election.”

The stakes here aren’t just political; they’re personal. For the 20,000 people on that list, the difference between a counted ballot and a set-aside vote is the difference between having a voice in the midterms and being silenced by a federal lawsuit.

The pattern of “bad faith” prosecutions

Essayli’s tenure has been defined by a “hard-charging” approach that often ignores traditional prosecutorial norms. Since spring 2025, his office has focused heavily on Trump’s critics and those protesting immigration crackdowns. The results have been an anomaly in federal law enforcement. While federal prosecutors typically maintain a conviction rate above 90%, Essayli’s record in immigration-related protest cases tells a different story.

From the State Assembly to the DoJ

Essayli’s transition to federal prosecutor followed a career marked by ideological combat. In 2022, he was elected to the California state assembly, where he became known for railing against “woke” policies. His time in the assembly was punctuated by volatility, including an incident where he shouted “You’re a fucking liar!” at a colleague after his microphone was cut.

Bill Essayli fights to block thousands of California ballots

When Donald Trump took office for a second term in 2025, Essayli was brought back to the DoJ as an interim U.S. Attorney. This appointment allowed him to bypass Senate confirmation, giving him immediate control over 500 staffers and a jurisdiction covering 20 million people.

The “Takedown” strategy

The legal community is now watching closely to see if these tactics will lead to Essayli’s removal. In one key case this week, a federal judge ruled that Essayli was acting "unlawfully," a decision that strikes at the heart of his authority and his future within the Justice Department.

Bill Essayli Warns California Over Counting Ballots From 20,000 Suspected Noncitizens