Outside Groups Spend $123 Million on Alaska U.S. Senate Race

Equal Power on a 100-Seat Board

When Democrats and Republicans start counting to 51, a U.S. Senate seat in Alaska carries the exact same weight as one from any other state. All 100 senators get an equal vote, whether they represent states with fewer than 1 million residents, like Alaska and Wyoming, or more than 30 million, such as California and Texas. The men who drafted the U.S. Constitution nearly 239 years ago crafted this compromise to balance the interests of larger and smaller states, establishing equal representation in the Senate while scaling the House by population. Little did they know that generations later, that compromise would make campaigning for an Alaska Senate seat a relative bargain compared to the massive outlays required in more populous regions.

Millions Flood the Final Stretch

That bargain has drawn a massive rush of Outside money into the state. Total spending between incumbent Alaska Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, Democrat challenger Mary Peltola, and their supporters surpassed $123 million as of last week, with additional funds expected before the Nov. 3 election. That total works out to almost enough for every two-person household of voters to buy a new set of snow tires—though the cost of gas makes actually driving on them a separate financial hurdle.

A Bargain Compared to Texas and Ohio

Yet that price tag is a fraction of what plays out in other battlegrounds. Senate races in Texas have drawn $533 million in spending, while Ohio totals reach $435 million. Because an Alaska senator counts just as much toward 51 as a senator from those vastly more expensive states, national political operations have flooded Alaska mailboxes, streaming services, social media feeds, and commercial breaks with aggressive messaging.

Decades of Drafts Versus Endless Campaigns

The Founding Fathers took less than four months to debate, draft, and approve the entire U.S. Constitution. Modern Senate campaigns, by contrast, stretch out for years, turning local elections into expensive, intrusive nationwide battlegrounds. Alaskans find themselves treated like a cheap date—cheaper, at least, than Texas—by Outside groups trying to buy a path to 51 senators. If this were an actual date, the appropriate local response might involve tossing a glass of cold water into the face of Outside interests, walking away from the table, and finding a way home alone.

Outside Groups Spend $123 Million on Alaska U.S. Senate Race
Outside groups report nearly $13 million in Alaska Senate spending in one week